Patently-O is Closed for the Season
« RIM Appeals to the Supreme Court | Main | CAFC: When is trash "in" a trashcan? »
Dec 21, 2005
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c588553ef00d8345bf7ef69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Patently-O is Closed for the Season:
» A Useful Christmas Invention . . . from IPcentral Weblog
. . . from Patently-O.... [Read More]
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Subscribe
Patently-O is the most popular patent law blog and a daily read for over fifteen thousand patent law professionals from every major innovative corporation, IP Law Firm and world patent office. Click the link above to receive an automatic Patently-O e-mail each morning with the freshest posts.
Recent Posts
- The Pope on Patents
- Sanctions for Frivolous Lawsuit: Fraser v. High Liner Foods
- The Changing Nature Inventing: Collaborative Inventing
- Inter Partes Reexamination Statistics
- En Banc Federal Circuit To Rehear Tafas v. Doll
- Ex Parte Reexamination Pendency
- Happy Fourth-of-July
- The Flawed Nature of the False Marking Statute
- Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
- Bits and Bites: Voting Again
- Dropping Claim Counts
- Centocor v. Abbott: $1.67 Billion Jury Verdict
- Prelim: The Association Between Grant Rate and Pre-Filing Searches
- Effect of a Stipulated Dismissal
- Evidence Based Prosecution: The Status of Applications Filed 4 ½ Years Ago
- Timeline of the BPAI Backlog
- Bits and Bytes: In the News
- Patently-O Bits and Bytes
- Understanding the Role of the Board of Patent Appeals: Ex Parte Rejection Rates on Appeal
- Bits and Bytes: Kappos & Dudas
- Understanding the Role of the Board of Patent Appeals: Ex Parte Rejection Rates on Appeal
- David Kappos: Next USPTO Director
- Preliminary Injunctions and Obviousness in Design Patent Law
- Appealing BPAI Rejections to the Federal Circuit
- Bits and Bytes: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination
- BPAI Backlog
- Lack of Standing: Dismiss with(out) prejudice
- Court Costs: $1,000,000 in Translation Costs Awarded to Prevailing Party
- Injunctive Relief: District Court Abused Discretion by Failing to Consider eBay Factors
- Bits and Bytes
Categories
- Academic Studies
- Accelerated Examination
- All Elements
- Amicus Brief
- Anticipation
- Articles and Publications
- Attorney Fees
- Best Mode
- Bits and Bytes
- Blogroll
- Book Review
- BPAI
- Business Developments
- CAFC
- Certificate of Correction
- Chemical
- Claim Construction
- Claim Drafting Tips
- Conference or CLE
- Contributory Infringement
- Damages
- Declaratory Judgment
- Design Patent
- Dissent
- District Court
- Doctrine of Equivalents
- EFiling
- En Banc
- Enablement
- Fees
- First Sale / Exhaustion
- Gaming
- Graham Factors
- Guest Post
- Indefinite
- Inducement
- Inequitable Conduct
- Infringement
- Injunctions
- Interference
- Invalidity
- Inventors
- Inventorship
- ITC
- Jurisdiction
- Law Firm Practice
- Lear Doctrine
- License
- Local Rules
- Means Plus Function
- Medical Device
- Method Claims
- Motivation to Combine
- Obviousness
- On Sale
- Patent Cases 2004
- Patent Cases 2005
- Patent Cases 2006
- Patent Cases 2007
- Patent Cases 2008
- Patent Cases 2009
- Patent Legislation
- Patent Prosecution
- Patent Q&A
- Patentable Subject Matter
- Pharma
- PHOSITA
- Post Grant Review
- Priority Rights
- Procedure
- Provisional Patent Application
- Public Use
- Reexamination
- Reissue
- Revival
- Settlement
- Software
- State Immunity
- Statutory Construction
- Summary Judgment
- Supreme Court
- Takings
- Teaching Away
- TipCast
- Tools
- Trade Secret
- Transnational
- USPTO News
- Vitiation
Friends
- ABA blawgs
- Coby Nixon
- Delaware IP
- Donoghue
- ELS
- Fire of Genius
- Green Patents
- Heinze
- Inventive Step
- IP Biz
- IP Kat
- IP Watch
- Law School Book Docket
- Mark Walters
- MCSmith
- Nipper
- Orange Book Blog
- Patent Baristas
- Patent Docs
- Patent Prospectors
- Philip Brooks
- PLI Blog
- Prof Goldman
- Promote The Progress
- Reichel
- SCOTUS Blog
- Spicy IP
- The Patent Law Journal
- Truth on the Market
Author
- Dennis Crouch,
Associate Professor
University of Missouri
School of Law - Short Articles:
- Preferred Blog Citation: Dennis Crouch, [Title of Post], Patently-O, [permalink URL] (Date).
Recent Comments
- Eric Shaffer on The Pope on Patents
- R30 on Sanctions for Frivolous Lawsuit: Fraser v. High Liner Foods
- MaxDrei on Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
- Robert Fish on Sanctions for Frivolous Lawsuit: Fraser v. High Liner Foods
- aformeralterboywithabonetopick on The Pope on Patents
- Wurlitzer on The Pope on Patents
- Just an ordinary inventor(TM) on The Pope on Patents
- Noise above Law on Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
- Rapidly learning summer associate on The Pope on Patents
- Just an ordinary inventor(TM) on Sanctions for Frivolous Lawsuit: Fraser v. High Liner Foods
- Rapidly learning summer associate on The Pope on Patents
- Patent Heathen on The Pope on Patents
- Federally Circuitous on The Pope on Patents
- Wondering on Sanctions for Frivolous Lawsuit: Fraser v. High Liner Foods
- Just an ordinary inventor(TM) on The Pope on Patents
- Jules on Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
- Eric Shaffer on The Pope on Patents
- I wonder on Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
- Kendall on The Pope on Patents
- I wonder on Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
Terms of Use & Disclaimer
- Terms of Use
- Patently-O on Facebook
Connect with Patently-O readers. -
-
What a neat idea for a hat should be a must get for any single men and women out there!
Posted by: Ashley Bowers | Dec 21, 2005 at 10:42 AM
That looks like holly, not mistletoe...
Posted by: Scott | Dec 21, 2005 at 12:07 PM
aha that's why it never works for me . . .
Posted by: crouch | Dec 21, 2005 at 04:26 PM
Season's greetings to you too! COol invention, all we need now is solar powered christmas lights. LOL
Posted by: zeenie | Dec 21, 2005 at 10:02 PM
Solar powered christmas lights are disclosed, for example, in US 5,034,658 to Hierig et al., entitled "Christmas-tree, decorative, artistic and ornamental object illumination apparatus", although the invention is really that the lights are connected to the power source by either infra-red or induction.
Posted by: Alun | Dec 22, 2005 at 09:59 AM
I particularly like reference number 20, indicating the small gap between "male" and "female." (At least, I'm assuming that's what they are... it's hard to tell, since they aren't labeled). Or maybe, 20 refers to the loving look in "female's" eyes.
Posted by: Unreasonable Man | Dec 28, 2005 at 10:05 AM